The RSB office are excited to announce that the Funding Module of Gateway will be going live from Friday, 15th September. This new system will replace the RGA forms and the need for paper sign off. From the 15th anyone developing or submitting an application for research or enterprise funding will be able to get their application signed off in Gateway.
You’ll be happy to know that the new system will deliver a number of improvements:-
- Better reporting of projects
- Improved visibility of workloads, deadlines and outstanding tasks
- Increased accuracy in fund reporting
- Ability to request review of proposals by peers, RSB or others at a touch of a button.
To help staff in the introduction of this new funding module, a Drop-In Session will take place on Monday, 18th September from 10am-2pm in the Top Lodge Conservatory – bring your laptop or phone and the RSB team will be available to talk you through this new process. If you prefer a 1:1 or group session, please contact RSB@northampton.ac.uk and we will be happy to come to you. Depending on demand, further drop-in sessions can be planned.
We are looking forward to this new system going live and believe it will provide a more efficient way of managing research funding.
Want to Know More about Finding the Right Funder?
This interactive workshop is designed to help you to navigate the funding landscape and will cover topics on identifying the main sources of funding, how to use GRANTfinder effectively and winning tactics on how to increase your chance of success. The session is ideal if you have specific research ideas and would like help in finding external funding for them. Facilitated by Karen Lewis, Bidding Manager for the Research and Strategic Bidding Office.
This workshop will take place on Thursday, 25th May from 10am-12pm in Room S036, Sulgrave Building, Park Campus. To book a place, please click on the Eventbrite link.
All you need to know when Writing a Winning Bid
Writing a winning bid isn’t as simple as just putting your ideas down on paper. Making sure that your written application does your project justice is key to impressing the reviewers and securing funding. Facilitated by Helen Backhouse, Bidding Officer for the Research and Strategic Bidding Office, this workshop will equip you with the tools to write a winning bid of your own.
Tuesday, 25th April from 2-4pm in Room C312, Cottesbrooke Building, Park Campus.
To book your place, please click on the Eventbrite link.
Many funders, especially those awarding public monies, now make it a prerequisite of funding that all published outputs should be made open access. You should make it clear in your bid how you intend to comply with this requirement.
The main issues you need to address at the bidding stage are:
- Does your prospective funder have a policy on open access?
- If so, have they opted for ‘gold’ (made OA by the publisher) or ‘green’ (deposited in an OA repository) open access to published outputs?
- If ‘gold’, are they willing to pay article processing charges (APCs)?
- Do they require open access outputs to be released under a particular licence (e.g. CC BY)?
- Are you and your collaborative partners willing to comply with the funder’s OA requirements?
Two stage application processes for research grants are becoming increasingly common. As the resources available for distribution become more limited yet the pressure for academics to secure external funding for their research increases, the competition for each and every grant becomes more fierce.
To manage this demand, funders are implementing Outline Applications. These are shorter applications that, generally, request details such as the research question and project idea, the experience of those who are to lead and deliver the project and the costs involved of doing so. The purpose is to assess how your proposal fits with their priorities and the feasibility of the project. If they like the proposal, they will invite you to submit a Full Application with more detail. This of course makes the process easier for them; they still receive hundreds of applications but these are a couple of pages long rather than the weighty documents usually required by funders. They can sift ideas more easily, find those that they like and then request the detail they need to make fully informed decisions in order to distribute the money.
However, there seems to be a troubling misunderstanding of the purpose of Outline Applications within our academic community; outline applications are not there to make life easier for you. We hear “It’s only an Outline” all too often. Outline applications shouldn’t be rushed in the hope that you’ve done enough to get through to the Full Application stage, which will of course get your full attention. In fact, Outline Applications mean more work for you and funders don’t apologise for this.
To significantly increase your chances of being successful at Outline Application stage, you need to work through the bid as though it were a Full Application. You need to know what your idea is, what problem it will address, how you will deliver the project in real detail including a timetable of activities and deliverables, be able to justify your methodology, and have it properly costed by your School Accountant. Some funders, The Leverhulme Trust for example, will not let you change the costs between Outline and Full Application stage, proving that they want you to know all of this detail at Outline stage. Once you know what you would need to know for a Full Application, you can write the summary the funder wants in the Outline Application with enough detail and conviction to spark their interest.
If you don’t know this detail at Outline Application stage, you’re effectively telling the funder that you’re not that interested in your proposal. So why should they be? Outline Applications may be short, but they’re clearly not simple. Outline Applications need to be of the highest quality so please, no more “It’s only an Outline…”